Ãëàâíàÿ
Technology and design in electronic equipment, 2024, no. 1-2, pp. 43-48.
DOI: 10.15222/TKEA2024.1-2.43
UDC 536.248.2
Influence of geometric factors on the heat transfer characteristics of two-phase thermosyphons
(in Ukrainian)
Kravets V. Yu.1, Shepel A. S.1, Hurov D. I.1, Danylovich A. O.2

Ukraine, Kyiv, 1National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”; 2ISEE SSU.

Thermosyphons are two-phase closed heat exchange systems that contain a certain amount of liquid and utilize the latent heat of vaporization and condensation to transfer heat between the heat source and the heat sink without any external devices. They are a type of heat pipe that lacks a capillary structure, so the return of the condensed coolant from the condensation zone to the heating zone is driven by gravitational forces. Due to the absence of a capillary structure, thermosyphons exhibit lower resistance to the movement of the vapor-liquid mixture from the heating zone to the condensation zone, as well as to the return flow of the condensate.
A distinctive feature of such systems is their high equivalent thermal conductivity, which is several orders of magnitude greater than that of natural metals (such as copper or silver). Because of their superior heat transfer characteristics, thermosyphons are widely used in various technical fields, including the chemical and petroleum industries, electronics, telecommunications devices, energy storage systems, and geothermal heating systems, among others.
This paper presents experimental data on the heat transfer characteristics of two-phase thermosyphons with an internal diameter of 9 mm and lengths of 500, 700, and 1000 mm, using water as the coolant. The filling ratio (Fr) varied from 0.3 to 1.2. The length of the condensation zone was the same for all thermosyphons. The study was conducted with the thermosyphons oriented vertically at an angle of 90° relative to the horizontal. The influence of the filling ratio and the effective length of the thermosyphons on the minimum thermal resistance, the maximum heat flux, and the equivalent thermal conductivity is analyzed.

Keywords: thermosyphon, effective length, thermal resistance, heat flux, equivalent thermal conductivity, spatial orientation.

Received 20.05 2024
References
  1. Reay D., Kew P., Mcglen R. Heat pipes theory, design and applications. USA, Published by Elsevier LTD, 2014, 251 p.
  2. Faghri A. Heat pipe science and technology. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor &Francis, 1995, 849 p.
  3. Franco A., Filippeschi S. Closed loop two-phase thermosyphon of small dimensions: a review of the experimental results. Microgravity Sci. Technol., 2012, vol. 24, pp. 65 – 79.
  4. Di Marco P., Filippeschi S., Franco A., Jafari D. Theoretical analysis of screened heat pipes for medium and high temperature solar applications. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2014, 547:012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/547/1/012010
  5. Peterson G. P. An Introduction to Heat Pipes: Modeling, Testing and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, September 1994, 356 p.
  6. Zolfagharroshan M., Zueter A. F., Tareen M. S.K. et al. Two-phase closed thermosyphons (TPCT) for geothermal energy extraction: A computationally efficient framework. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2024, vol. 248, part B, art. 123205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.123205
  7. Wang Yi., Wang Xi, Wang Ju. Heat transfer performance of a two-phase closed thermosiphon with different inclination angles based on the core-tube monitoring, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2023, vol. 42, art. 102738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.102738
  8. Jouhara H., Robinson A. J. Experimental investigation of small diameter two-phase closed thermosyphons charged with water, FC-84, FC-77 and FC-3283. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, vol. 30(2 – 3), ðð. 201 – 211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2009.08.007
  9. Bezrodnyy M. K., Pioro I. L., Kostyuk T. O. Protsessy perenosa v dvukhfaznykh termosifonnykh sistemakh. Teoriya i praktika [Transfer processes in two-phase thermosiphon systems. Theory and practice]. Kyiv, Fakt, 2005, 704 p. (Rus)
  10. Kannan M., Senthil R., Baskaran R., Deepanraj B. An experimental study on heat transport capability of a two phase thermosyphon charged with different working fluids. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 2014, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 584 – 591. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2014.584.591
  11. Imura H., Sasaguchi K., Kozai H. Critical heat flux in a closed two phase thermosyphon, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 1983, vol. 26, iss. 8, pp. 1181–1188.
  12. Kravets V. Yu., Pysmennyi E. N., Konshin V. I. [Pulsation phenomena in closed two-phase thermosyphons], Zbirnyk nauk. prats' SNUYAE ta P, 2009, iss. 4(32), pp. 39 ¬ 46. (Rus)
  13. Kravets V. Yu. Protsesy teploobminu u miniatyurnykh vyparno-kondensatsiynykh systemakh okholodzhennya [Heat exchange processes in miniature evaporative-condensation cooling systems]. Kharkiv, FOP Brovin O.V., 2018, 288 p. (Ukr).