Assessment of assembly complexity of electronic units

  • Oleksandr Tynynyka Одеський національний політехнічний університет
Keywords: production complexity, multi-subject assembly lines, models, socio-technical systems, quantitative methods

Abstract

The article is devoted to the complexity assessment of harvesting systems. The author considers peculiarities of assembly lines as production systems and the reasons for the constant growth of their complexity. Complex assembly systems are expensive to implement, run, control and maintain, while their complexity affects performance, quality and reliability. Thus, when designing any assembly system, one must look for compromises between its future operation features, its cost and its complexity. To do this, you need to be able to quantify the complexity.
This study made it possible to classify the methods of complexity analysis and propose a model that allows quantifying, to some extent, the complexity of the assembly of electronic units and can be used to work with complex multi-subject lines. The study considers the complexity indicators for the operator`s work. To numerically assess the complexity indicators, it is proposed to use the Likert scale.
It is assumed that further research should take into account the following issues. The assembly should be designed with consideration of the human factor and the interrelation of technological operations, tools and ergonomics. This is due to the fact that in manual and semi-automatic workplaces, the human operator plays the crucial part. The connection between ergonomics and complexity must be established using the utility function, methods of fuzzy logic, and computer experiments with a test dummy.

References

ElMaraghy W., Elmaraghy H., Tomiyama T., Monostori L. Complexity in engineering design and manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 2012, vol. 61, iss. 2, pp. 793–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.001

Schuha G., Rudolfa S., Riesenera M. et al. Product production complexity research: developments and opportunities. Procedia CIRP, 2017, vol. 60, pp. 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.006

Falck A.-C., Rosenqvist M. Relationship between complexity in manual assembly work, ergonomics and assembly quality. Ergonomics for Sustainability and Growth, NES 2012, Stockholm, Sweden.

Fässberg T., Fasth Å., Hellman F. et al. Interaction between complexity, quality and cognitive automation. Proceedings of the 4th CIRP Conference on Assembly Technologies and Systems, 2012, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

D’Addona D. Emergent synthetic approach for management of complexity in production systems. Cogent Engineering, 2019, 20 p. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2019.1684174

Papakostas N., Efthymiou K., Chryssolouris G. et al. Assembly process templates for the automotive industry. In: 3rd CIRP Conference on Assembly Technologies and Systems. 2010, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 151–156.

ElMaraghy H., Samy S.N., Espinoza V. A classification Code for Assembly Systems. In: 3rd CIRP Conference on Assembly Technologies and Systems. 2010, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 145–150.

Vogel W., Lasch R. Complexity drivers in manufacturing companies: a literature review. Springer.com, 2016, 66 p.

Alkan В., Vera D. A., Ahmad M., Bilal Ahmad B., Harrison R. Complexity in manufacturing systems and its measures: a literature review. European J. Industrial Engineering, 2018, vol. 12, no. 1, рp. 115–151.

Sokolov V.V. An approach to assessing the complexity of systems. AIT. Retrieved from: http://www.ait.org.ua/p/pub_podhod.html (Date of access: 25.02.2021) (Rus)

ElMaraghy W. H., Urbanic R. J. Assessment of manufacturing operational complexity. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2004, vol. 53, iss. 1, pp. 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60726-4

Zeltzer L., Limere V., Aghezzaf E.-H., Van Landeghem H. Measuring the objective complexity of assembly workstations, Int. Multi-Conf. on Computing in the Global Information Techn., Venice, Italy, 2012.

Efthymiou K., Pagoropoulos A., Papakostas N. et al. Manufacturing systems complexity: An assessment of manufacturing performance indicators unpredictability. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2014, vol. 7, iss. 4, pp. 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2014.07.003

Brinzer B., Schneider K. Complexity assessment in production: linking complexity drivers and effects. 53rd CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, 2020, vol. 93, pp. 694–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.014

Asadi N., Jackson M., Fundin A. Drivers of complexity in a flexible assembly system- A case study. 48th CIRP Conference on manufacturing systems — Procedia CIRP, 2016, vol. 41, pp. 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.082

Ribeiro L., Hochwallner M. On the design complexity of cyberphysical production systems. Complexity, 2018, article ID 4632195, 13 p. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4632195

Gazizov T., Sagiyeva I., Kuksenko C. Solving complexity problem in the electronics production process by reducing the sensitivity of transmission line characteristics to their parameters variations. Complexity, vol. 2019, article ID 6301326, 11 p. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6301326

Published
2021-03-23